Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10091 - 10100 of 66444 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 10091 - 10100 of 66444 for motion to dismiss.
[PDF]
State v. Leon S. Groeschl
of his agreement on the dismissed charges and enhancers. For this reason, his motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15255 - 2017-09-21
of his agreement on the dismissed charges and enhancers. For this reason, his motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15255 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. We affirm the judgment but reverse the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35337 - 2009-01-27
denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. We affirm the judgment but reverse the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35337 - 2009-01-27
State v. Leon S. Groeschl
agreement on the dismissed charges and enhancers. For this reason, his motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15255 - 2005-03-31
agreement on the dismissed charges and enhancers. For this reason, his motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15255 - 2005-03-31
State v. John H. Maclin
counts of theft. One count of each type was dismissed, and the other counts were dismissed and read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19379 - 2008-04-07
counts of theft. One count of each type was dismissed, and the other counts were dismissed and read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19379 - 2008-04-07
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction and an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Osinski argues to this court that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62911 - 2011-04-19
of conviction and an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Osinski argues to this court that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62911 - 2011-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS
)(c), and 346.65(2)(g)2. Gibbs contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35179 - 2009-01-13
)(c), and 346.65(2)(g)2. Gibbs contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35179 - 2009-01-13
State v. Deryl B. Beyer
. · March 28, 2003: Beyer filed a motion to dismiss counsel because Attorney Anderson had not yet
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20877 - 2006-01-09
. · March 28, 2003: Beyer filed a motion to dismiss counsel because Attorney Anderson had not yet
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20877 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was then appointed to represent Chang. Van Ells filed various motions on Chang’s behalf, including three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227510 - 2018-11-20
was then appointed to represent Chang. Van Ells filed various motions on Chang’s behalf, including three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227510 - 2018-11-20
[PDF]
Wisconsin Coalition for Voter Participation, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Elections Board
The circuit court granted the Board’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the action, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16051 - 2017-09-21
The circuit court granted the Board’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the action, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16051 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Carol Ann Schaidler v. Mercy Medical Center of Oshkosh, Inc.
, Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Carol Ann Schaidler appeals from judgments dismissing her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14363 - 2014-09-15
, Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Carol Ann Schaidler appeals from judgments dismissing her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14363 - 2014-09-15