Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1011 - 1020 of 17369 for Cost.

COURT OF APPEALS
, and awarded Burback $12,751.57 of its claimed $23,284.07 in costs and attorney’s fees. Maringer appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127980 - 2014-11-18

COURT OF APPEALS
and the cost of mediation. We affirm. ¶2 Jason and Kristin Spitzmacher were married on August 28, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81584 - 2012-04-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for the minor child’s variable expenses. Dietzen and Anderson both move for sanctions, costs, and attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133045 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] OWI Guidelines District 3 (effective December 1, 2018)
)  Court UmayU, after a finding of inability to pay, reduce the costs or forfeiture and order the person
/publications/fees/docs/d3owi2018-2.pdf - 2018-11-29

[PDF] OWI Guidelines District 3 (effective November 8, 2018)
)  Court UmayU, after a finding of inability to pay, reduce the costs or forfeiture and order the person
/publications/fees/docs/d3owi2018.pdf - 2018-11-08

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. Backes
that Attorney Backes pay the costs of the disciplinary proceeding. ¶6 Attorney Backes contends
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18294 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 259
denying its request for 12% prejudgment interest and optical imaging costs. Because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30842 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 48
require the municipalities to pay certain charges for sewerage treatment and capital costs. They also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697514 - 2023-10-11

2007 WI App 259
% prejudgment interest and optical imaging costs. Because the trial court did not err in ruling on the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30842 - 2007-12-18

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. Backes
of fee refunds to two clients. The referee recommended further that Attorney Backes pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18294 - 2005-05-24