Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1011 - 1020 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, as well as an order denying his postconviction motion. Lamb argues the sentencing court demonstrated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219750 - 2018-09-25

[PDF] WI APP 34
“free” on bail in his 2004 case, but spent 50 days in custody before being released on bail in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31611 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 122
by Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000), in deciding Wohlers’ motion to modify visitation; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69081 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
in treatment of his mental health issues and pattern of domestic violence. Following a trial on the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228136 - 2018-11-20

State v. Peter R. Martel
in." The State and Martel agreed to a joint sentence recommendation of a withheld sentence and 36 months
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16639 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Peter R. Martel
agreed to a joint sentence recommendation of a withheld sentence and 36 months of probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16639 - 2017-09-21

[MS WORD] FA-4144VB: Order Suspending Proceedings to Effect Reconciliation
2 Petitioner/Joint Petitioner A: Respondent/Joint Petitioner B
/formdisplay/FA-4144VB.doc?formNumber=FA-4144VB&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2024-03-27

COURT OF APPEALS
could be evenly divided between Gaylan and Rose. The decision explained that joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75827 - 2011-12-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
divided between Gaylan and Rose. The decision explained that joint custody was not contested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75827 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 28, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
to support the verdict. Morton also argues that the trial court erred when it granted the State’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66689 - 2011-06-27