Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1011 - 1020 of 81790 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 1011 - 1020 of 81790 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
[PDF]
State v. Nickolas G. Carlson
sample. The essence of Carlson's claim that he did not refuse the test is the absence of a statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9445 - 2017-09-19
sample. The essence of Carlson's claim that he did not refuse the test is the absence of a statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9445 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
authorize the testing of the sample. Schneller argues that testing of the blood sample was a separate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192011 - 2017-09-21
authorize the testing of the sample. Schneller argues that testing of the blood sample was a separate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192011 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Dana E.
. 01-2047 01-2048 2 APPEALS from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: MICHAEL N
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4246 - 2017-09-19
. 01-2047 01-2048 2 APPEALS from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: MICHAEL N
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4246 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Dana E.
. 01-2047 01-2048 2 APPEALS from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: MICHAEL N
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4247 - 2017-09-19
. 01-2047 01-2048 2 APPEALS from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: MICHAEL N
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4247 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael R. Saich
test result because the blood sample was taken without a warrant, and because it constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2380 - 2005-03-31
test result because the blood sample was taken without a warrant, and because it constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2380 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony T. Hicks
comparisons, the State performed no other tests on the hair samples. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8058 - 2005-03-31
comparisons, the State performed no other tests on the hair samples. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8058 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Anthony T. Hicks
no other tests on the hair samples. The State performed serological testing on specimens of semen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8058 - 2017-09-19
no other tests on the hair samples. The State performed serological testing on specimens of semen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8058 - 2017-09-19
State v. Katherine E. Hepler
Bohling. ΒΆ9 Hepler also argues that testing the blood sample constituted a second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5277 - 2005-03-31
Bohling. ΒΆ9 Hepler also argues that testing the blood sample constituted a second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5277 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark R. Anderson
that the blood test results were admissible on two independent grounds: the sample was drawn in compliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20383 - 2017-09-21
that the blood test results were admissible on two independent grounds: the sample was drawn in compliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20383 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark R. Anderson
. The court concluded that the blood test results were admissible on two independent grounds: the sample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20383 - 2005-11-22
. The court concluded that the blood test results were admissible on two independent grounds: the sample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20383 - 2005-11-22