Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1011 - 1020 of 12959 for se.
Search results 1011 - 1020 of 12959 for se.
State v. Olton Lee Dumas
Merry was appointed to represent Dumas. On July 17, 1995, Dumas filed, pro se, a notice of appeal from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12649 - 2005-03-31
Merry was appointed to represent Dumas. On July 17, 1995, Dumas filed, pro se, a notice of appeal from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12649 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Vincent E. Smith
that trial counsel was ineffective for: (1) leaving him to argue his plea withdrawal motion pro se;3 (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2571 - 2017-09-19
that trial counsel was ineffective for: (1) leaving him to argue his plea withdrawal motion pro se;3 (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2571 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Rafeal Dashawn Newson, pro se, appeals orders denying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362731 - 2021-05-04
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Rafeal Dashawn Newson, pro se, appeals orders denying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362731 - 2021-05-04
[PDF]
State v. Travis J. Smith
and Curley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Travis J. Smith appeals pro se from a judgment entered on jury verdicts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6189 - 2017-09-19
and Curley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Travis J. Smith appeals pro se from a judgment entered on jury verdicts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6189 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. Backes
, at an end." ¶13 In November 2002 F.M. filed a pro se motion for postconviction relief. On December 13
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20018 - 2017-09-21
, at an end." ¶13 In November 2002 F.M. filed a pro se motion for postconviction relief. On December 13
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20018 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul L. Polak
counsel and indicated that he wanted to continue the case pro se. On May 24, 2000, Polak appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4172 - 2017-09-19
counsel and indicated that he wanted to continue the case pro se. On May 24, 2000, Polak appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4172 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Scot A. Czarnecki
police witness. The court established the following per se rule: [P]rospective jurors who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14408 - 2014-09-15
police witness. The court established the following per se rule: [P]rospective jurors who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14408 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 190
objections of a pro se defendant, and No. 2006AP1338-CR 3 then granted the converted motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29712 - 2014-09-15
objections of a pro se defendant, and No. 2006AP1338-CR 3 then granted the converted motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29712 - 2014-09-15
State v. Paul L. Polak
counsel and indicated that he wanted to continue the case pro se. On May 24, 2000, Polak appeared for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4172 - 2011-09-25
counsel and indicated that he wanted to continue the case pro se. On May 24, 2000, Polak appeared for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4172 - 2011-09-25
State v. Scot A. Czarnecki
established the following per se rule: [P]rospective jurors who are related to a state witness by blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14408 - 2005-03-31
established the following per se rule: [P]rospective jurors who are related to a state witness by blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14408 - 2005-03-31