Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10101 - 10110 of 82978 for case search.

State v. Thomas C. Johnson
424 (Ct. App. 1990). Moreover, in this case, Ladwig did not continue to question or search Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6166 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Richard Herbert Voigt v. City of Merrill
, 463 N.W.2d 364 (Ct. App. 1990). Further, it is this court’s obligation “to search for credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4304 - 2017-09-19

Judith Kay Briggs v. Donald James Briggs
court’s reasoning is not expressly stated, we may search the record to determine whether discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6150 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is whether the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable police officer, in light of his or her training
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106876 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051051 - 2025-12-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
.” No. 2023AP821 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we affirm. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932661 - 2025-03-25

State v. Robert R. Taylor
assistance was reasonable under the facts of the particular case, viewed as of the time of counsel’s conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5417 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Brent R. Reed
. Background ¶2 This case arose out of a traffic investigation late one Saturday night in March 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26248 - 2017-09-21

Richard Herbert Voigt v. City of Merrill
486, 493, 463 N.W.2d 364 (Ct. App. 1990). Further, it is this court’s obligation “to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4304 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, but we review the constitutionality of a search or seizure de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131304 - 2017-09-21