Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10101 - 10110 of 68274 for did.
Search results 10101 - 10110 of 68274 for did.
State v. John D. Bobbitt, Jr.
conviction for First Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety because the evidence did not show, beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8400 - 2005-03-31
conviction for First Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety because the evidence did not show, beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8400 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
stated to the officer, “I’m going to bed”; however, Miller did not in fact move from the front door
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57605 - 2010-12-08
stated to the officer, “I’m going to bed”; however, Miller did not in fact move from the front door
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57605 - 2010-12-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be allowed to take Dexter with her, too. Kueffer did not allow Dexter to leave. ¶5 Kueffer testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77789 - 2014-09-15
be allowed to take Dexter with her, too. Kueffer did not allow Dexter to leave. ¶5 Kueffer testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77789 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not have a complete understanding of the charges against him; (2) that he should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75603 - 2014-09-15
did not have a complete understanding of the charges against him; (2) that he should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75603 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
owed $2,400 in additional child support. The court concluded that, because Poltrock did not comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62492 - 2011-04-06
owed $2,400 in additional child support. The court concluded that, because Poltrock did not comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62492 - 2011-04-06
COURT OF APPEALS
to a jurisdictional challenge. Because we conclude the circuit court did not address whether the delay in charging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36256 - 2009-04-22
to a jurisdictional challenge. Because we conclude the circuit court did not address whether the delay in charging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36256 - 2009-04-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
an argument that he was entitled to a jury instruction for a legal proposition that did not exist at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28141 - 2007-02-19
an argument that he was entitled to a jury instruction for a legal proposition that did not exist at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28141 - 2007-02-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
erroneously found that Kohlman did not raise any factual dispute. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211799 - 2018-04-23
erroneously found that Kohlman did not raise any factual dispute. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211799 - 2018-04-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
because they did not have actual or apparent authority to search a bedroom in his aunt’s house. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32064 - 2014-09-15
because they did not have actual or apparent authority to search a bedroom in his aunt’s house. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32064 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kathy Schmidt v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
Institute did not abuse its discretion when it decided not to hire her as a laundry worker. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7918 - 2017-09-19
Institute did not abuse its discretion when it decided not to hire her as a laundry worker. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7918 - 2017-09-19