Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10111 - 10120 of 41688 for jury duty/1000.

[PDF] Julia Cole v. Yvonne L. Hubanks
duties as a police officer. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16629 - 2017-09-21

Julia Cole v. Yvonne L. Hubanks
the course of Cole's duties as a police officer. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and remand for further
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16629 - 2005-03-31

Robert Pasko v. City of Milwaukee
personnel to carry out duties of higher ranking personnel rather than filling vacancies at those higher
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17546 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jeramey J. Byrge
jury trial on Byrge’s NGI pleas, the trial court was prepared to conduct the competency hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13229 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Brown County v. Shannon R.
that the instructions presented to the jury relating to state law elements for termination of parental rights
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20457 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 59
repeated the story that they told police during their interrogations. A jury convicted Ott
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217538 - 2018-10-11

Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
issues went to the jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the defendants. Gagliano appealed
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=511&year=2013

[PDF] Approval Date: 12/03/2024 Page 1
of the GAL is necessary as it is the court’s duty to oversee the GAL’s performance of their obligations
/formdisplay/JD-1798Bs_summary.pdf?formNumber=JD-1798Bs&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-01-07

[PDF] SC Table of Pending Cases: Added oral argument dates for October, 2010
. David A. Dearborn Was the defendant denied his right to a unanimous jury verdict due
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53656 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 183
was not imposing a threshold duty on the Lamberts to inspect the property. Rather, the court was properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26139 - 2014-09-15