Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10121 - 10130 of 69024 for had.

State v. Gary J. Schmidt
the jury was selected but before opening statements, the court learned that several jurors had seen Schmidt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4611 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Peter L. Walls v. Pamela A. Walls
Peter's pro se request for an No. 96-0270 -2- adjournment because he had only received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10316 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Keith L. Allen
. After the robber left the garage, Tellier's wife told Tellier that Allen had had a knife and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10642 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
2 trial, the court denied Jones’s motion to introduce evidence that C.B. and M.W. had made prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118321 - 2014-09-15

WI App 101 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2178-CR Complete Titl...
was waiting in line with her mother and another woman who had come with her, two correctional officers who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121796 - 2014-10-28

COURT OF APPEALS
, they settled on a twenty-three-year-old woman in a car. The men indicated that they had a weapon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28683 - 2007-04-16

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
Markestad had made “continual mistaken” calls to the police department, that she had given a “convoluted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93808 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
because they told me I could.” ¶7 In its remarks, the circuit court explained that it had to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132813 - 2017-09-21

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Virjean L.
of housemates placed on Virjean because she had a history of becoming involved with abusive, unsafe men. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26560 - 2006-09-25

State v. Domingo Ramirez
(1996), dealing with the no-knock rule. Our supreme court had adopted a rule providing that when police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2278 - 2005-03-31