Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10121 - 10130 of 54422 for linda s blake obituary 1984.
Search results 10121 - 10130 of 54422 for linda s blake obituary 1984.
Luis Santana v. Jeffrey P. Endicott
judgment, order or execution specified in s. 782.02. (3) The cause or pretense of such imprisonment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20592 - 2006-01-24
judgment, order or execution specified in s. 782.02. (3) The cause or pretense of such imprisonment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20592 - 2006-01-24
[PDF]
Fred J. Perri v. Diocese of La Crosse
of Appleton, 121 Wis.2d 560, 360 N.W.2d 550 (Ct. App. 1984). In Black, we held that Wisconsin courts lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8582 - 2017-09-19
of Appleton, 121 Wis.2d 560, 360 N.W.2d 550 (Ct. App. 1984). In Black, we held that Wisconsin courts lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8582 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“different No. 2011AP1726-CR 3 route[s] to plea withdrawal.” State v. Basley, 2006 WI App 253
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86029 - 2014-09-15
“different No. 2011AP1726-CR 3 route[s] to plea withdrawal.” State v. Basley, 2006 WI App 253
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86029 - 2014-09-15
State v. Dequelvin M. Douglas
and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: s. michael wilk, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12005 - 2005-03-31
and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: s. michael wilk, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12005 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1984). To prove prejudice for purposes of plea withdrawal, the defendant must demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997158 - 2025-08-20
(1984). To prove prejudice for purposes of plea withdrawal, the defendant must demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997158 - 2025-08-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 2008 WI App 169, ¶6 n.6, 314 Wis. 2d 724, 762 N.W.2d 449 (Supreme Court Rule 71.01(2)’s all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39668 - 2014-09-15
, 2008 WI App 169, ¶6 n.6, 314 Wis. 2d 724, 762 N.W.2d 449 (Supreme Court Rule 71.01(2)’s all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39668 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Lewandowski v. Callaway, 118 Wis. 2d 165, 171, 346 N.W.2d 457 (1984). A petitioner must show the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894349 - 2024-12-26
. Lewandowski v. Callaway, 118 Wis. 2d 165, 171, 346 N.W.2d 457 (1984). A petitioner must show the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894349 - 2024-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
at whether “‘the evidence, viewed most favorably to the [S]tate and the conviction, is so lacking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115772 - 2014-06-30
at whether “‘the evidence, viewed most favorably to the [S]tate and the conviction, is so lacking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115772 - 2014-06-30
[PDF]
State v. Gregory L. Clay
enunciated in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). First, the defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10878 - 2017-09-20
enunciated in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). First, the defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10878 - 2017-09-20
State v. Duncan LaPlant
. Adm. Code Chapter ATCP 134 notes: “This chapter is adopted under authority of s. 100.20(2), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8084 - 2005-03-31
. Adm. Code Chapter ATCP 134 notes: “This chapter is adopted under authority of s. 100.20(2), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8084 - 2005-03-31