Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10121 - 10130 of 50107 for our.
Search results 10121 - 10130 of 50107 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption that the trial court acted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129298 - 2017-09-21
Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption that the trial court acted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129298 - 2017-09-21
Charles Johnson v. Rogers Memorial Hospital, Inc.
903. The Supreme Court reviewed our decision and reversed without reaching the merits of our holding
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1244 - 2004-04-14
903. The Supreme Court reviewed our decision and reversed without reaching the merits of our holding
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1244 - 2004-04-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of counsel. Our review of the record confirms counsel’s conclusion that these potential issues lack
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120489 - 2014-09-15
of counsel. Our review of the record confirms counsel’s conclusion that these potential issues lack
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120489 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. With regard to the circuit court’s sentencing discretion, our review of the Record confirms that the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=879176 - 2024-11-20
. With regard to the circuit court’s sentencing discretion, our review of the Record confirms that the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=879176 - 2024-11-20
City of Prairie Du Chien v. George J. Eastman
for the admission of a breath[] test." Id. at 673, 674, 314 N.W.2d at 912, 913. We based our holding largely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8576 - 2005-03-31
for the admission of a breath[] test." Id. at 673, 674, 314 N.W.2d at 912, 913. We based our holding largely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8576 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to do so. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460646 - 2021-12-07
to do so. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460646 - 2021-12-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at this point in the proceedings relate to sentencing following revocation. Our review of a sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119691 - 2014-09-15
at this point in the proceedings relate to sentencing following revocation. Our review of a sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119691 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
jumping. Strohkirch was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207815 - 2018-01-30
jumping. Strohkirch was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207815 - 2018-01-30
CA Blank Order
regarding child support and attorney’s fees. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141514 - 2015-05-06
regarding child support and attorney’s fees. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141514 - 2015-05-06
CA Blank Order
potential issue for appeal is the trial court’s imposition of sentence following revocation. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101834 - 2013-09-08
potential issue for appeal is the trial court’s imposition of sentence following revocation. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101834 - 2013-09-08