Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10121 - 10130 of 64227 for records/1000.
Search results 10121 - 10130 of 64227 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
support award. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205880 - 2017-12-18
support award. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205880 - 2017-12-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108136 - 2017-09-21
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108136 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ralph E. Harris
not filed a response. Based on our independent review of the record as required by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8813 - 2005-03-31
not filed a response. Based on our independent review of the record as required by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8813 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
recorded its lien on the property on March 12, 2008. Citimortgage’s lien was not recorded until March 19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68886 - 2014-09-15
recorded its lien on the property on March 12, 2008. Citimortgage’s lien was not recorded until March 19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68886 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399784 - 2021-07-28
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399784 - 2021-07-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197019 - 2017-09-27
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197019 - 2017-09-27
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95380 - 2013-04-16
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95380 - 2013-04-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219086 - 2018-09-19
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219086 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Billy J. Rachal
to disregard these mitigating factors. The court instead focused on Billy’s record of several criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3029 - 2017-09-19
to disregard these mitigating factors. The court instead focused on Billy’s record of several criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3029 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, was advised of his right to file a response, but did not do so. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573562 - 2022-10-04
, was advised of his right to file a response, but did not do so. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573562 - 2022-10-04