Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10121 - 10130 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 10121 - 10130 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel and trial court error. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83737 - 2014-09-15
motion for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel and trial court error. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83737 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The trial court sentenced him to thirty years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120833 - 2014-09-15
. The trial court sentenced him to thirty years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120833 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of trial counsel; (2) his convictions for kidnapping and human trafficking were not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141596 - 2015-05-11
assistance of trial counsel; (2) his convictions for kidnapping and human trafficking were not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141596 - 2015-05-11
[PDF]
State v. Richard J. Kenyon
(1)(b) and (3)(c), STATS. He claims the trial court erred in admitting certain “other acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13075 - 2017-09-21
(1)(b) and (3)(c), STATS. He claims the trial court erred in admitting certain “other acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13075 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert M. Madsen
for postconviction relief. Madsen first contends he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5398 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief. Madsen first contends he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5398 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
On appeal, Pundsack argues that the trial court erred when it declined to instruct the jury on self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242580 - 2019-06-25
On appeal, Pundsack argues that the trial court erred when it declined to instruct the jury on self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242580 - 2019-06-25
State v. Gregory J. Franklin
by Kansas v. Crane, 534 U.S. 407 (2002); (2) the trial court erred in admitting “other acts” evidence; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2997 - 2005-03-31
by Kansas v. Crane, 534 U.S. 407 (2002); (2) the trial court erred in admitting “other acts” evidence; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2997 - 2005-03-31
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Howard A.
) “the verdict failed to support” the termination of parental rights (TPR); (3) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16002 - 2005-03-31
) “the verdict failed to support” the termination of parental rights (TPR); (3) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16002 - 2005-03-31
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Howard A.
) “the verdict failed to support” the termination of parental rights (TPR); (3) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16001 - 2005-03-31
) “the verdict failed to support” the termination of parental rights (TPR); (3) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16001 - 2005-03-31
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Howard A.
) “the verdict failed to support” the termination of parental rights (TPR); (3) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16003 - 2005-03-31
) “the verdict failed to support” the termination of parental rights (TPR); (3) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16003 - 2005-03-31