Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10131 - 10140 of 17479 for ex.
Search results 10131 - 10140 of 17479 for ex.
[PDF]
Christine Magnuson Stanfield v. Paul E. Magnuson
court recently explained in State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County, 2004 WI 58, 271
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7373 - 2017-09-20
court recently explained in State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County, 2004 WI 58, 271
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7373 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
in the first instance, consistent with the general legal meaning of that term”); State ex rel. Murphy v. Voss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35709 - 2009-03-03
in the first instance, consistent with the general legal meaning of that term”); State ex rel. Murphy v. Voss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35709 - 2009-03-03
[PDF]
The Baraboo National Bank v. State
., 1921. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8561 - 2017-09-19
., 1921. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8561 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark D. Pett
is, like any evidentiary rule, committed to the trial court’s discretion. See State ex rel. Strykowski v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5726 - 2005-03-31
is, like any evidentiary rule, committed to the trial court’s discretion. See State ex rel. Strykowski v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5726 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to Woldmoe’s right to testify, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 A jury convicted Woldmoe of stalking his ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142665 - 2015-06-01
to Woldmoe’s right to testify, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 A jury convicted Woldmoe of stalking his ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142665 - 2015-06-01
State v. John J. Watson
” maintained by the Department of Health and Social Services, which it says were held admissible in State ex
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8931 - 2005-03-31
” maintained by the Department of Health and Social Services, which it says were held admissible in State ex
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8931 - 2005-03-31
Lawrence J. Plourde v. John Berends
and the applicability of a statute to a set of facts are questions of law. See State ex rel. Newspapers, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25437 - 2006-08-08
and the applicability of a statute to a set of facts are questions of law. See State ex rel. Newspapers, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25437 - 2006-08-08
[PDF]
WI App 44
. ¶11 When interpreting statutes, we start with the language of the statutes. State ex rel. Kalal v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540669 - 2022-09-14
. ¶11 When interpreting statutes, we start with the language of the statutes. State ex rel. Kalal v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540669 - 2022-09-14
COURT OF APPEALS
common, ordinary, and accepted meaning within the context in which it is used. State ex rel. Kalal v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30929 - 2007-11-20
common, ordinary, and accepted meaning within the context in which it is used. State ex rel. Kalal v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30929 - 2007-11-20
[PDF]
City of Shullsburg v. Ronald L. Monahan
. State ex rel. Brajdic v. Seber, 53 Wis.2d 446, 450, 193 N.W.2d 43, 46 (1972). Monahan asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13387 - 2017-09-21
. State ex rel. Brajdic v. Seber, 53 Wis.2d 446, 450, 193 N.W.2d 43, 46 (1972). Monahan asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13387 - 2017-09-21