Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10131 - 10140 of 44386 for name change.

Rebecca E. Roethke v. James B. Roethke
, 1996, this property was titled in his name alone. The 1992 and 1993 assessed values were $18,520
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12144 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins
erroneously changed the jury answer to reduce the conversion award against Hawkins, Ash, Baptie & Company
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16853 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 104
, in itself, does not change the interpretation of the WFEA. There is no ipso facto incorporation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121632 - 2014-11-11

Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins
to enforce; (2) the circuit court erroneously changed the jury answer to reduce the conversion award against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16853 - 2005-03-31

WI App 104 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP13 Complete Title of ...
.” LIRC explained: The fact that the [Ledbetter Act] was passed, in itself, does not change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121632 - 2014-10-28

[PDF] NOTICE
Respondent Kenneth Young moved for a change in a negotiated family support payment. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44902 - 2014-09-15

Julie M. Lassa v. Todd Rongstad
interest in clearing her name and the state's interest in preventing fraud and libel, an interest
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25913 - 2006-07-12

[PDF] Julie M. Lassa v. Todd Rongstad
5 Lassa also named A.M. Mailing Services, Inc., as a defendant. A.M. Mailing's role in the mailer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25913 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
change of circumstances; and (3) determining that Boynton overcame the presumption that the current
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31689 - 2008-01-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, Anderson failed to establish that a substantial change in circumstances had occurred since that time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=430912 - 2021-09-28