Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10131 - 10140 of 64192 for records/1000.
Search results 10131 - 10140 of 64192 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
enhancers pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 939.62(1) (2019-20).2 Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542903 - 2022-07-13
enhancers pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 939.62(1) (2019-20).2 Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542903 - 2022-07-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85754 - 2014-09-15
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85754 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237939 - 2019-03-26
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237939 - 2019-03-26
State v. Robert P. Eggimann
On the question of prejudice, Eggimann claims the record shows that the State failed to demonstrate that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2381 - 2005-03-31
On the question of prejudice, Eggimann claims the record shows that the State failed to demonstrate that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2381 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2015AP2567-CRNM 2 no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162597 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2015AP2567-CRNM 2 no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162597 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. Williams responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100156 - 2013-07-29
. Williams responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100156 - 2013-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
75, ¶29, 326 Wis. 2d 640, 785 N.W.2d 493. We will not reverse a discretionary decision if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87675 - 2012-10-01
75, ¶29, 326 Wis. 2d 640, 785 N.W.2d 493. We will not reverse a discretionary decision if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87675 - 2012-10-01
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the entire record and the no-merit report, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977244 - 2025-07-02
the entire record and the no-merit report, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977244 - 2025-07-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record, we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179419 - 2017-09-21
of the report and an independent review of the record, we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179419 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
proceeding had concluded. He alleged that the PSI contained inaccurate information about his criminal record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34511 - 2008-11-05
proceeding had concluded. He alleged that the PSI contained inaccurate information about his criminal record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34511 - 2008-11-05