Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10131 - 10140 of 82881 for simple case search.

[PDF] City of Sun Prairie v. William D. Davis
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-1651 Complete Title of Case: City
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17275 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] John A. Balcerzak v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners for the City of Milwaukee
2000 WI App 50 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2889
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14599 - 2017-09-21

John A. Balcerzak v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners for the City of Milwaukee
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2889
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14599 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
CED provides no case law or direct statutory support for its argument, claiming only that the term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182502 - 2017-09-21

Village of Walworth v. Ryan S. Wood
was proper. ¶2 Under the facts of this case, we hold that the trial court had the inherent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16010 - 2005-03-31

Village of Walworth v. Ryan S. Wood
was proper. ¶2 Under the facts of this case, we hold that the trial court had the inherent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16011 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
misdemeanor cases that have been consolidated for purposes of appeal: a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697751 - 2023-08-31

[PDF] Ronald Pierner v. Computer Resources and Technology, Inc.
permitting the trial court to decide the case on the legal issues, although always subject to the rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13043 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
testimony about Ali’s possession of evidence that had been suppressed in an earlier case. We reject Ali’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40355 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
in an earlier case. We reject Ali’s arguments and affirm the judgment and order. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40355 - 2009-09-02