Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10141 - 10150 of 30191 for de.
Search results 10141 - 10150 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
NOTICE
arguments. A. Right to Speedy Sentencing ¶8 We review de novo whether a defendant has been denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29183 - 2014-09-15
arguments. A. Right to Speedy Sentencing ¶8 We review de novo whether a defendant has been denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29183 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mark O. Williams
involves application of a statute to undisputed facts, an issue of law subject to de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5692 - 2017-09-19
involves application of a statute to undisputed facts, an issue of law subject to de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5692 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Brown County v. Marcella G.
of the petitioner-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C. of De
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3816 - 2017-09-20
of the petitioner-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C. of De
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3816 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Brown County v. Marcella G.
of the petitioner-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C. of De
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3817 - 2017-09-20
of the petitioner-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C. of De
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3817 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
and answer violated a prior judge’s written order presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53413 - 2014-09-15
and answer violated a prior judge’s written order presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53413 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determination of whether counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251667 - 2019-12-27
determination of whether counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251667 - 2019-12-27
State v. Wesley H.
). Whether a petition is sufficient is a matter of law subject to this court’s de novo review. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3953 - 2005-03-31
). Whether a petition is sufficient is a matter of law subject to this court’s de novo review. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3953 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of constitutional law subject to de novo review. State v. Nieves, 2017 WI 69, ¶15, 376 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546694 - 2022-07-27
a question of constitutional law subject to de novo review. State v. Nieves, 2017 WI 69, ¶15, 376 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546694 - 2022-07-27
Cynthia M. Kettner v. Jeffrey S. Kettner
motion, entering a fixed physical placement schedule. Kettner requested a de novo review in the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4175 - 2005-03-31
motion, entering a fixed physical placement schedule. Kettner requested a de novo review in the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4175 - 2005-03-31
William W. Welter v. City of Milwaukee
. Our review is de novo. Id. Further, interpretation of a statute or ordinance is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8488 - 2005-03-31
. Our review is de novo. Id. Further, interpretation of a statute or ordinance is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8488 - 2005-03-31