Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10141 - 10150 of 83387 for simple case search.
Search results 10141 - 10150 of 83387 for simple case search.
State v. Peggy A. Hampton
unreasonable searches and seizures. The circuit court denied her motion to suppress, and Hampton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15243 - 2005-03-31
unreasonable searches and seizures. The circuit court denied her motion to suppress, and Hampton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15243 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Peggy A. Hampton
violated her Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15243 - 2017-09-21
violated her Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15243 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
into the building and permitted them to search his No. 2015AP2659 6 apartment to exclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179029 - 2017-09-21
into the building and permitted them to search his No. 2015AP2659 6 apartment to exclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179029 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert J. Stynes
2003 WI 65 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 02-1143-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16620 - 2005-03-31
2003 WI 65 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 02-1143-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16620 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jamie Lee Moore
criminal. The two cases were consolidated. The jury was unable to reach a verdict on the former charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9928 - 2005-03-31
criminal. The two cases were consolidated. The jury was unable to reach a verdict on the former charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9928 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
applies here. Discussion ¶14 This is a case with a fairly simple bottom line, but getting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92280 - 2014-09-15
applies here. Discussion ¶14 This is a case with a fairly simple bottom line, but getting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92280 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
agree with Salinas and reverse and remand for new trials. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case involves three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140015 - 2017-09-21
agree with Salinas and reverse and remand for new trials. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case involves three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140015 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
This case involves three sets of crimes and two victims, although only two sets of crimes are directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140015 - 2015-04-20
This case involves three sets of crimes and two victims, although only two sets of crimes are directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140015 - 2015-04-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
cases is the same; we therefore use the case names interchangeably when referring to Escalona’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34384 - 2014-09-15
cases is the same; we therefore use the case names interchangeably when referring to Escalona’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34384 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
warranting the application of the procedural bar under the particular facts and circumstances of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34384 - 2008-10-27
warranting the application of the procedural bar under the particular facts and circumstances of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34384 - 2008-10-27