Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10161 - 10170 of 16513 for commenting.

Frontsheet
requested "leniency." The referee commented that in his judgment, a 90-day suspension was lenient under
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33321 - 2008-07-07

State v. Michael E. Learmont
officer's report, the court declared that it likewise believed the assault occurred and further commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14673 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
comments, when taken in context, belie that argument. It stated that “the court needs to emphasi[ze
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67803 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Fred J. Kulig v. Trempealeau Electric Cooperative
of the PSC Docket … in which they commented that Mr. Beane’s background does not qualify him as an expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15737 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
….” The court’s comments on the credibility of both Mitra’s mother and Schmidt are made in the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45732 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Dennis E. Jones
by the prosecutor. “A prosecutor may comment on the evidence, detail the evidence, argue from it to a conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24709 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Gary J. Schmidt
argues that this was an impermissible comment upon his silence. After closing arguments ended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4611 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 31, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
or for harassment purposes. The circuit court’s comments regarding harassment, which he described as “gratuitous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85608 - 2012-07-30

Orville H. Werner v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
not disclose any bronchiectasis. Further, as I commented in my initial report, the absence of a productive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8333 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gary J. Schmidt
argues that this was an impermissible comment upon his silence. After closing arguments ended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4611 - 2005-03-31