Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10161 - 10170 of 17742 for ex.

State v. Marketta A. Hughes
determination. State ex rel. Warren v. Schwarz, 219 Wis. 2d 615, 635, 579 N.W.2d 698 (1998); State v. Black
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18519 - 2005-07-26

State v. Charles Brown
and convincing evidence that withdrawal is necessary to avoid manifest injustice. State ex rel. Warren v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7011 - 2005-03-31

WI App 106 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP249 Complete Title of...
. If the meaning of the statute is plain, we ordinarily stop the inquiry.’” State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121940 - 2014-10-28

State v. Eugene Keeler
case, relying on United States ex rel. Clauser v. McCevers, 731 F.2d 423, 431 (7th Cir. 1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15118 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. James Gulley
ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d 675, 682, 556 N.W.2d 136 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3793 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Charles Brown
by clear and convincing evidence that withdrawal is necessary to avoid manifest injustice. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7011 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI APP 157
definitions. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County, 2004 WI 58, ¶45, 271 Wis. 2d 633, 681
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29096 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
should not be rewarded. See State ex rel. Wren v. Richardson, 2019 WI 110, ¶14, 389 Wis. 2d 516, 936
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980009 - 2025-07-09

Karen M. Polakowski v. John R. Polakowski
of maintenance payments.[1] After obtaining an order modifying his maintenance obligation, John and his ex-wife
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5494 - 2005-03-31

Paul G. Walker v. Eau Claire County Child Support Agency
” remedy of ending support upon his unilateral decision that his ex-wife’s actions were so egregious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15052 - 2005-03-31