Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10171 - 10180 of 68502 for did.
Search results 10171 - 10180 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to testify that she did not unbuckle the child’s pants; the assaults did not happen three days in a row
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101620 - 2017-09-21
to testify that she did not unbuckle the child’s pants; the assaults did not happen three days in a row
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101620 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Watkins
on provocation. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying Watkins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7642 - 2017-09-19
on provocation. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying Watkins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7642 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
instruction for a legal proposition that did not exist at the time of his trial. He even concedes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28141 - 2014-09-15
instruction for a legal proposition that did not exist at the time of his trial. He even concedes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28141 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kathy Schmidt v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
Institute did not abuse its discretion when it decided not to hire her as a laundry worker. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7918 - 2017-09-19
Institute did not abuse its discretion when it decided not to hire her as a laundry worker. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7918 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
this issue in the direct (no-merit) appeal, we conclude that the trial court did not err in ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27037 - 2014-09-15
this issue in the direct (no-merit) appeal, we conclude that the trial court did not err in ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27037 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
prescription drug.[2] Keys did not testify. ¶4 The jury found Keys guilty of all charges. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70353 - 2011-08-29
prescription drug.[2] Keys did not testify. ¶4 The jury found Keys guilty of all charges. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70353 - 2011-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
with people,” so it was “impossible to do what this guy stated .... I did not do this.” ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97435 - 2013-05-28
with people,” so it was “impossible to do what this guy stated .... I did not do this.” ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97435 - 2013-05-28
[PDF]
State v. Sean R. Haverty
claims that the arresting officer did not have probable cause to arrest him for operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21286 - 2017-09-21
claims that the arresting officer did not have probable cause to arrest him for operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21286 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not have a complete understanding of the charges against him; (2) that he should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75603 - 2014-09-15
did not have a complete understanding of the charges against him; (2) that he should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75603 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Waukesha v. Ydbi Islami
officer did not accommodate his request for an alternate test. The trial court denied Islami’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3908 - 2017-09-20
officer did not accommodate his request for an alternate test. The trial court denied Islami’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3908 - 2017-09-20