Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10171 - 10180 of 69007 for had.
Search results 10171 - 10180 of 69007 for had.
[PDF]
Deborah J. Bull v. City of St. Croix Falls
. This court disagrees. The City acknowledged it had a duty to protect Bull’s property from further damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15664 - 2017-09-21
. This court disagrees. The City acknowledged it had a duty to protect Bull’s property from further damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15664 - 2017-09-21
Richard J. Allen, Jr. v. Kari A. Allen
the authority to expunge any arrears that had accrued up to January 1, 2003. We therefore reverse that part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7034 - 2005-03-31
the authority to expunge any arrears that had accrued up to January 1, 2003. We therefore reverse that part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7034 - 2005-03-31
Tony Shaw v. Gary R. McCaughtry
that the adjustment committee had “failed to abide by its own rules when considering the statements of certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12871 - 2005-03-31
that the adjustment committee had “failed to abide by its own rules when considering the statements of certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12871 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
later discovered that Reinheimer had gotten a tattoo that day. The next day, Reinheimer was discharged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107811 - 2014-02-11
later discovered that Reinheimer had gotten a tattoo that day. The next day, Reinheimer was discharged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107811 - 2014-02-11
State v. Carl A. Knoll
is whether the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest him for the offense—specifically whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13104 - 2005-03-31
is whether the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest him for the offense—specifically whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13104 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven T. Miller
revocation because, at the time of sentencing in the instant case, he had not yet begun serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10936 - 2005-03-31
revocation because, at the time of sentencing in the instant case, he had not yet begun serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10936 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary A. Malkmus
enhancements declared void. Malkmus argued that the State had not proven the existence of a prior conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11445 - 2005-03-31
enhancements declared void. Malkmus argued that the State had not proven the existence of a prior conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11445 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis R. Armstrong
of the crime, his apparent continued harassment of the victim, his belief that he had not been wrong, and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10956 - 2005-03-31
of the crime, his apparent continued harassment of the victim, his belief that he had not been wrong, and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10956 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
restaurant, which had no building lights or outside sign lights on, at approximately 2:00 a.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33775 - 2014-09-15
restaurant, which had no building lights or outside sign lights on, at approximately 2:00 a.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33775 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mark M. Loutsch
that he had a child support obligation and would accrue arrearages, by his estimate, of around
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6639 - 2017-09-20
that he had a child support obligation and would accrue arrearages, by his estimate, of around
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6639 - 2017-09-20