Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10171 - 10180 of 68758 for had.
Search results 10171 - 10180 of 68758 for had.
[PDF]
State v. David T.O.
he had no prior record and was receptive to future treatment. Both sides correctly state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10741 - 2017-09-20
he had no prior record and was receptive to future treatment. Both sides correctly state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10741 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
restaurant, which had no building lights or outside sign lights on, at approximately 2:00 a.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33775 - 2008-08-20
restaurant, which had no building lights or outside sign lights on, at approximately 2:00 a.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33775 - 2008-08-20
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Armstrong
owed at $162.72. 2 Armstrong had signed and discussed with his lawyer a plea questionnaire which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10956 - 2017-09-19
owed at $162.72. 2 Armstrong had signed and discussed with his lawyer a plea questionnaire which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10956 - 2017-09-19
State v. William A. Gasper
not identified any defense that would have been available had the timeframe been further narrowed. Gasper had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10941 - 2005-03-31
not identified any defense that would have been available had the timeframe been further narrowed. Gasper had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10941 - 2005-03-31
Lewis Lloyd v. Firstar Bank Fond du Lac
of res judicata. Firstar asserted that Lloyd’s claims had already been adjudicated in a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3855 - 2005-03-31
of res judicata. Firstar asserted that Lloyd’s claims had already been adjudicated in a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3855 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 28, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
to the implied consent law and therefore he had a medical reason for his refusal. He asserts that his testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28519 - 2007-03-27
to the implied consent law and therefore he had a medical reason for his refusal. He asserts that his testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28519 - 2007-03-27
[PDF]
Barb Company v. American States Insurance Company
substance had burned on the floor near the front of the store and that a laboratory found gasoline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8598 - 2017-09-19
substance had burned on the floor near the front of the store and that a laboratory found gasoline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8598 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Lewis Lloyd v. Firstar Bank Fond du Lac
that Lloyd’s claims had already been adjudicated in a prior foreclosure action between the parties. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3855 - 2017-09-20
that Lloyd’s claims had already been adjudicated in a prior foreclosure action between the parties. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3855 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
he had a medical reason for his refusal. He asserts that his testimony on that score
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28519 - 2014-09-15
he had a medical reason for his refusal. He asserts that his testimony on that score
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28519 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
alleged a defect in the plea colloquy because the circuit court had not reviewed the elements of burglary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107714 - 2014-02-03
alleged a defect in the plea colloquy because the circuit court had not reviewed the elements of burglary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107714 - 2014-02-03