Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10171 - 10180 of 41672 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 10171 - 10180 of 41672 for jury duty/1000.
David M. Iushewitz v. Milwaukee County PersonnelReview Board
) the writ is based on a clear, specific legal right which is free from substantial doubt; (2) the duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8541 - 2005-03-31
) the writ is based on a clear, specific legal right which is free from substantial doubt; (2) the duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8541 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David M. Iushewitz v. Milwaukee County PersonnelReview Board
is free from substantial doubt; (2) the duty sought to be enforced is positive and plain; (3) substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8541 - 2017-09-19
is free from substantial doubt; (2) the duty sought to be enforced is positive and plain; (3) substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8541 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
also sought Greene’s suspension from teaching and advising duties during the pendency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355150 - 2021-04-13
also sought Greene’s suspension from teaching and advising duties during the pendency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355150 - 2021-04-13
State v. Alex W.S.
duty to report the sexual assault, he contends that this duty does not govern the admissibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14162 - 2005-03-31
duty to report the sexual assault, he contends that this duty does not govern the admissibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14162 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of immunity holds that an officer is liable for negligence in the performance of a ministerial duty. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35531 - 2014-09-15
of immunity holds that an officer is liable for negligence in the performance of a ministerial duty. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35531 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 23, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of...
supreme court recently affirmed the duty mandated by White, clarifying that the court must ascertain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34096 - 2008-09-22
supreme court recently affirmed the duty mandated by White, clarifying that the court must ascertain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34096 - 2008-09-22
State v. Daniel J. Jurkovic
part: (2) Implied consent. Any person who is on duty time with respect to a commercial motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16299 - 2005-03-31
part: (2) Implied consent. Any person who is on duty time with respect to a commercial motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16299 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Neng Yee Lo v. Kohl's Food Stores, Inc.
established that Kohl's was not negligent as a matter of law, that Pinkerton's had no duty to the plaintiffs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7932 - 2017-09-19
established that Kohl's was not negligent as a matter of law, that Pinkerton's had no duty to the plaintiffs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7932 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CR-210: Appointment of Special Prosecutor under Chapter 978
to attend to duties due to a health issue or has a mental incapacity that impairs ability to perform duties
/formdisplay/CR-210B.pdf?formNumber=CR-210B&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2019-04-05
to attend to duties due to a health issue or has a mental incapacity that impairs ability to perform duties
/formdisplay/CR-210B.pdf?formNumber=CR-210B&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2019-04-05
State v. Harris D. Byers
against Byers prior to his release date and requested a jury trial. ¶4 Byers moved to dismiss
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16356 - 2005-03-31
against Byers prior to his release date and requested a jury trial. ¶4 Byers moved to dismiss
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16356 - 2005-03-31