Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10171 - 10180 of 18354 for re.
Search results 10171 - 10180 of 18354 for re.
State v. Patricia E. K.
premised on the prior version of the statute. The State refers to In re M.D.(S.), 168 Wis. 2d 995, 485 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20695 - 2005-12-19
premised on the prior version of the statute. The State refers to In re M.D.(S.), 168 Wis. 2d 995, 485 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20695 - 2005-12-19
Frontsheet
to contact Attorney Coplien by telephone. See In re Sandra Kay Coplien, IL Supreme Court No. MR 22301
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54058 - 2010-09-02
to contact Attorney Coplien by telephone. See In re Sandra Kay Coplien, IL Supreme Court No. MR 22301
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54058 - 2010-09-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was a “re-sentencing on new evidence or something like that” but, rather, a simple “ministerial” task
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257475 - 2020-04-14
was a “re-sentencing on new evidence or something like that” but, rather, a simple “ministerial” task
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257475 - 2020-04-14
[PDF]
Douglas H. Mellum v. Catherine Ann Mellum
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: DOUGLAS H. MELLUM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21432 - 2017-09-21
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: DOUGLAS H. MELLUM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21432 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jody T. Lindsey
motion for re-sentencing, must be affirmed.[6] By the Court.—Judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13135 - 2005-03-31
motion for re-sentencing, must be affirmed.[6] By the Court.—Judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13135 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
In re the marriage of: Richard Edward Black, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Sung Ja
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67325 - 2011-07-06
In re the marriage of: Richard Edward Black, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Sung Ja
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67325 - 2011-07-06
COURT OF APPEALS
In re the marriage of: Eleanor L. Stilke-Joyce, Petitioner-Respondent, v. John J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35595 - 2009-02-24
In re the marriage of: Eleanor L. Stilke-Joyce, Petitioner-Respondent, v. John J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35595 - 2009-02-24
COURT OF APPEALS
In re the marriage of: Jennifer L. Devore p/k/a Jennifer L. Bentrup, Petitioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38467 - 2009-07-28
In re the marriage of: Jennifer L. Devore p/k/a Jennifer L. Bentrup, Petitioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38467 - 2009-07-28
John E. Pickel v. John Harr, Jr.
fall into disrepair while he was in sole possession and the Harrs have re-established their lives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11195 - 2005-03-31
fall into disrepair while he was in sole possession and the Harrs have re-established their lives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11195 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
OF APPEALS DISTRICT I In re the termination of parental rights to Kenneth E. III, a person under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57488 - 2010-12-06
OF APPEALS DISTRICT I In re the termination of parental rights to Kenneth E. III, a person under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57488 - 2010-12-06