Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10171 - 10180 of 83958 for simple case search.
Search results 10171 - 10180 of 83958 for simple case search.
[PDF]
NOTICE
or physically intimidated the defendant …; (3) whether the conditions attending the request to search were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57605 - 2014-09-15
or physically intimidated the defendant …; (3) whether the conditions attending the request to search were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57605 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of those issues in addition to our obligation in a no- merit appeal to independently search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44866 - 2014-09-15
of those issues in addition to our obligation in a no- merit appeal to independently search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44866 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steven W. Nielson
the preliminary breath test. Taking one’s breath for a preliminary breath test is a search under the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5885 - 2017-09-19
the preliminary breath test. Taking one’s breath for a preliminary breath test is a search under the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5885 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. State v. Pinkard, 2010
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453148 - 2021-11-16
Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. State v. Pinkard, 2010
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453148 - 2021-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS
him to a search. We affirm the circuit court’s denial of the motion to suppress evidence and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82117 - 2012-05-07
him to a search. We affirm the circuit court’s denial of the motion to suppress evidence and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82117 - 2012-05-07
[PDF]
WI 69
2008 WI 69 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2005AP1473; 2006AP174; 2006AP175
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33183 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI 69 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2005AP1473; 2006AP174; 2006AP175
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33183 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Donald J. Matta
the record for purposes of considering a suppression motion after he was appointed to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7835 - 2017-09-19
the record for purposes of considering a suppression motion after he was appointed to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7835 - 2017-09-19
State v. Donald J. Matta
Wis.2d 506, 522, 210 N.W.2d 873, 882 (1973), this was not the case here. The initial showup where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7835 - 2005-03-31
Wis.2d 506, 522, 210 N.W.2d 873, 882 (1973), this was not the case here. The initial showup where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7835 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Christina Holman v. Family Health Plan
with the oft-stated and simple rule that would appear to answer the question posed in this case: an amended
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17269 - 2017-09-21
with the oft-stated and simple rule that would appear to answer the question posed in this case: an amended
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17269 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not the—the most simple case, in that we’re hearing that [Lucy] suffers from a mental illness but that— that’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918301 - 2025-02-26
not the—the most simple case, in that we’re hearing that [Lucy] suffers from a mental illness but that— that’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918301 - 2025-02-26