Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10191 - 10200 of 68988 for had.
Search results 10191 - 10200 of 68988 for had.
State v. Charles E. Snodgrass
, we determine whether the magistrate had a substantial basis to conclude that probable cause existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4163 - 2005-03-31
, we determine whether the magistrate had a substantial basis to conclude that probable cause existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4163 - 2005-03-31
Tony Shaw v. Gary R. McCaughtry
that the adjustment committee had “failed to abide by its own rules when considering the statements of certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12871 - 2005-03-31
that the adjustment committee had “failed to abide by its own rules when considering the statements of certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12871 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
later discovered that Reinheimer had gotten a tattoo that day. The next day, Reinheimer was discharged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107811 - 2014-02-11
later discovered that Reinheimer had gotten a tattoo that day. The next day, Reinheimer was discharged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107811 - 2014-02-11
State v. Carl A. Knoll
is whether the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest him for the offense—specifically whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13104 - 2005-03-31
is whether the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest him for the offense—specifically whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13104 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven T. Miller
case, he had not yet begun serving the previously-imposed sentence and did not begin doing so until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10936 - 2017-09-20
case, he had not yet begun serving the previously-imposed sentence and did not begin doing so until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10936 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in open court that he had failed to visit or communicate with the child for a period of three or more
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141507 - 2017-09-21
in open court that he had failed to visit or communicate with the child for a period of three or more
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141507 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steven T. Miller
revocation because, at the time of sentencing in the instant case, he had not yet begun serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10936 - 2005-03-31
revocation because, at the time of sentencing in the instant case, he had not yet begun serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10936 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William A. Gasper
defense that would have been available had the timeframe been further narrowed. Gasper had been given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10941 - 2017-09-20
defense that would have been available had the timeframe been further narrowed. Gasper had been given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10941 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Armstrong
owed at $162.72. 2 Armstrong had signed and discussed with his lawyer a plea questionnaire which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10955 - 2017-09-19
owed at $162.72. 2 Armstrong had signed and discussed with his lawyer a plea questionnaire which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10955 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gary A. Malkmus
enhancements declared void. Malkmus argued that the State had not proven the existence of a prior conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11445 - 2005-03-31
enhancements declared void. Malkmus argued that the State had not proven the existence of a prior conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11445 - 2005-03-31