Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10191 - 10200 of 30324 for up.
Search results 10191 - 10200 of 30324 for up.
COURT OF APPEALS
, it was Jackson’s responsibility to follow up and ensure a timely response from the Public Defender’s office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30704 - 2007-10-24
, it was Jackson’s responsibility to follow up and ensure a timely response from the Public Defender’s office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30704 - 2007-10-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the record brought up by the writ. State ex rel. Richards v. Leik, 175 Wis. 2d 446, 455, 499 N.W.2d 276
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171781 - 2017-09-21
to the record brought up by the writ. State ex rel. Richards v. Leik, 175 Wis. 2d 446, 455, 499 N.W.2d 276
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171781 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Douglas Parks
pulled up along side the unmarked squad car and reported that the driver of a blue car behind him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14146 - 2014-09-15
pulled up along side the unmarked squad car and reported that the driver of a blue car behind him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14146 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Marquette v. Robert DeWitz
of the construction, their lot ended up several feet lower than the Barthels’ adjacent lot. To prevent erosion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25188 - 2017-09-21
of the construction, their lot ended up several feet lower than the Barthels’ adjacent lot. To prevent erosion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25188 - 2017-09-21
State v. Douglas Parks
with the following situation: an unidentified male driver pulled up along side the unmarked squad car and reported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14146 - 2005-03-31
with the following situation: an unidentified male driver pulled up along side the unmarked squad car and reported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14146 - 2005-03-31
Robert Peaslee v. David Peaslee
. David, in reply, asserts that up until trial Robert sought only a prescriptive easement, rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2212 - 2005-03-31
. David, in reply, asserts that up until trial Robert sought only a prescriptive easement, rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2212 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald R. Kotas
employee, ‘union or no union.’” Kotas further explained that he believed that he had been “set up” by his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16131 - 2005-03-31
employee, ‘union or no union.’” Kotas further explained that he believed that he had been “set up” by his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16131 - 2005-03-31
Nanci K. La Valliere v. Gerard J. La Valliere
in time.” The court noted it would be her fourth marriage. Summing up, the court said: “I think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7635 - 2005-03-31
in time.” The court noted it would be her fourth marriage. Summing up, the court said: “I think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7635 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sirvictor Bryant
, through the lower unit, into the basement, and up a different flight of stairs to the upstairs unit, where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3130 - 2005-03-31
, through the lower unit, into the basement, and up a different flight of stairs to the upstairs unit, where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3130 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was entitled to credit “for the time served up to when he was sentenced before Judge Harrington on May 30th
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101500 - 2013-09-03
was entitled to credit “for the time served up to when he was sentenced before Judge Harrington on May 30th
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101500 - 2013-09-03