Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1021 - 1030 of 6245 for cf.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
by their full names. Cf. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.86. We refer to the drug users who survived by their first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680940 - 2023-07-25

[PDF] Patricia Moran v. Milwaukee County
801.11(4)1. Cf. Medley v. City of Milwaukee, 969 F.2d 312, 320 (7th Cir. 1992) (service of § 893.80
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7380 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
method of proceeding. Cf. id. (it may be appropriate to disregard a forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251805 - 2020-01-02

[PDF] NOTICE
conclude that the circuit court did not believe King’s testimony regarding her observations. Cf. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30786 - 2014-09-15

State v. Michael D. Lewis
Acknowledgment in the record applies to No. 02‑CF‑275; however, it references charges of theft and first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7085 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Sherry L. Kryzaniak
1 Michael and Sherry Kryzaniak were charged separately (Nos. 98-CF-282 and 98-CF-281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2547 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in the charging decision are unjustified.” Johnson, 232 Wis. 2d 679, ¶30 (citation omitted); cf. Bordenkircher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89383 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
, found in § 973.055, should be vacated. Cf. State v. Cherry, 2008 WI App 80, ¶11, 312 Wis. 2d 203, 752
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107713 - 2014-02-03

COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that the circuit court did not believe King’s testimony regarding her observations. Cf. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30786 - 2007-11-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to Evaluators. Cf. Kickers of Wisconsin, 197 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80188 - 2014-09-15