Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1021 - 1030 of 29980 for de.
Search results 1021 - 1030 of 29980 for de.
City of Milwaukee v. Clifford R. Negley
claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11005 - 2005-03-31
claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11005 - 2005-03-31
William O. Chaudoir v. City of Sturgeon Bay
reviewed de novo, and the trial court's ultimate determination that this real estate was not specially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14967 - 2005-03-31
reviewed de novo, and the trial court's ultimate determination that this real estate was not specially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14967 - 2005-03-31
Mary Jane Lenhardt v. Paul W. Lenhardt
met her burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Finally, we note that a request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15820 - 2005-03-31
met her burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Finally, we note that a request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15820 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Shirley A. Negley
. The Negleys claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11004 - 2017-09-19
. The Negleys claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11004 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Since these are questions of statutory interpretation, our review is de novo, although we benefit from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255911 - 2020-03-11
. Since these are questions of statutory interpretation, our review is de novo, although we benefit from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255911 - 2020-03-11
[PDF]
”). The Ibrahims argue that the circuit court violated their right to due process by starting the trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737535 - 2023-12-07
”). The Ibrahims argue that the circuit court violated their right to due process by starting the trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737535 - 2023-12-07
[PDF]
Phyllis A. Tannler v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services
facts are questions of law we review de novo. Local No. 695 v. LIRC, 154 Wis.2d 75, 82, 452 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10237 - 2017-09-20
facts are questions of law we review de novo. Local No. 695 v. LIRC, 154 Wis.2d 75, 82, 452 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10237 - 2017-09-20
Labor Ready, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
it is entitled to “due weight” or “great bearing.” The lowest level of review, the de novo standard, is applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18634 - 2005-07-26
it is entitled to “due weight” or “great bearing.” The lowest level of review, the de novo standard, is applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18634 - 2005-07-26
WI app 65 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP362 Complete Title of ...
“is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Wis. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81713 - 2013-04-29
“is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Wis. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81713 - 2013-04-29
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 179, 192–193, 717 N.W.2d 1, 7. We review the matter de novo. Id., 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56991 - 2010-11-22
. 2d 179, 192–193, 717 N.W.2d 1, 7. We review the matter de novo. Id., 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56991 - 2010-11-22