Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1021 - 1030 of 15414 for probate.
Search results 1021 - 1030 of 15414 for probate.
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court mischaracterized his probation as being “mostly negative.” He argues that the only reason he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68176 - 2011-07-18
that the court mischaracterized his probation as being “mostly negative.” He argues that the only reason he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68176 - 2011-07-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
), concluding there is no basis for challenging the sentence imposed after revocation of Johnston’s probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130018 - 2017-09-21
), concluding there is no basis for challenging the sentence imposed after revocation of Johnston’s probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130018 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
of Markling’s probation. Markling has filed a response claiming he is entitled to additional sentence credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96337 - 2013-05-06
of Markling’s probation. Markling has filed a response claiming he is entitled to additional sentence credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96337 - 2013-05-06
[PDF]
Jason Amundson v. Village of Fairchild
will be April 1, 1999 with a 90 day probation period and he obtain his State certification (sic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3517 - 2017-09-19
will be April 1, 1999 with a 90 day probation period and he obtain his State certification (sic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3517 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a judgment sentencing him after revocation of his probation. Assistant State Public Defender Katie R. York
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151532 - 2017-09-21
a judgment sentencing him after revocation of his probation. Assistant State Public Defender Katie R. York
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151532 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, VerHagen argues that the court mischaracterized his probation as being “mostly negative.” He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68176 - 2014-09-15
, VerHagen argues that the court mischaracterized his probation as being “mostly negative.” He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68176 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
petition for certiorari review of a decision revoking his probation. We affirm. No. 2006AP1664
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30999 - 2014-09-15
petition for certiorari review of a decision revoking his probation. We affirm. No. 2006AP1664
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30999 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James A. Mentek, Jr. v. David H. Schwarz
an administrative appeal of his probation revocation despite his request to do so. Mentek further contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15028 - 2017-09-21
an administrative appeal of his probation revocation despite his request to do so. Mentek further contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15028 - 2017-09-21
James A. Mentek, Jr. v. David H. Schwarz
of counsel when his attorney decided not to seek an administrative appeal of his probation revocation despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15028 - 2005-03-31
of counsel when his attorney decided not to seek an administrative appeal of his probation revocation despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15028 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert L. Peterson
of misdemeanor theft, with the State recommending two years’ probation with a number of conditions. Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7178 - 2005-03-31
of misdemeanor theft, with the State recommending two years’ probation with a number of conditions. Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7178 - 2005-03-31