Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1021 - 1030 of 83433 for simple case search.
Search results 1021 - 1030 of 83433 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
) the evidence is material to an issue in the case; and (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative.’” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82115 - 2012-05-07
) the evidence is material to an issue in the case; and (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative.’” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82115 - 2012-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS
erred by granting summary judgment because the Department “failed to make a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140364 - 2015-04-22
erred by granting summary judgment because the Department “failed to make a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140364 - 2015-04-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment because the Department “failed to make a prima facie case that the Baileys’ property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140364 - 2017-09-21
summary judgment because the Department “failed to make a prima facie case that the Baileys’ property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140364 - 2017-09-21
Mercy Medical Center of Oshkosh v. Albert Fisher
a prima facie case and that Fisher’s affidavit in opposition failed to meet the statutory requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2940 - 2005-03-31
a prima facie case and that Fisher’s affidavit in opposition failed to meet the statutory requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2940 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 54
2010 WI App 54 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP564 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48347 - 2014-03-25
2010 WI App 54 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP564 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48347 - 2014-03-25
[PDF]
State v. Jesse Franklin
. § 756.096(3)(am) [1995-96] states: “A jury in [] misdemeanor case[s] shall consist of 6 persons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15280 - 2017-09-21
. § 756.096(3)(am) [1995-96] states: “A jury in [] misdemeanor case[s] shall consist of 6 persons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15280 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jesse Franklin
the statute mandating six-person juries in misdemeanor cases. In neither instance did he object to being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15280 - 2005-03-31
the statute mandating six-person juries in misdemeanor cases. In neither instance did he object to being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15280 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Phillip Adam v. Brown County
"more credible evidence in this case to be that there is a history of employees punching in somewhat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11297 - 2017-09-19
"more credible evidence in this case to be that there is a history of employees punching in somewhat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11297 - 2017-09-19
Phillip Adam v. Brown County
in this case to be that there is a history of employees punching in somewhat early and punching out after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11297 - 2005-03-31
in this case to be that there is a history of employees punching in somewhat early and punching out after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11297 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Nancy Thiede v. Terry Neuman
applied the regulation to the facts it found in this case. Clayton Weis was a 50% owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12825 - 2017-09-21
applied the regulation to the facts it found in this case. Clayton Weis was a 50% owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12825 - 2017-09-21