Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10211 - 10220 of 69007 for had.
Search results 10211 - 10220 of 69007 for had.
State v. William A. Gasper
not identified any defense that would have been available had the timeframe been further narrowed. Gasper had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10941 - 2005-03-31
not identified any defense that would have been available had the timeframe been further narrowed. Gasper had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10941 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
he had a medical reason for his refusal. He asserts that his testimony on that score
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28519 - 2014-09-15
he had a medical reason for his refusal. He asserts that his testimony on that score
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28519 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Lewis Lloyd v. Firstar Bank Fond du Lac
that Lloyd’s claims had already been adjudicated in a prior foreclosure action between the parties. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3855 - 2017-09-20
that Lloyd’s claims had already been adjudicated in a prior foreclosure action between the parties. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3855 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in open court that he had failed to visit or communicate with the child for a period of three or more
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141507 - 2017-09-21
in open court that he had failed to visit or communicate with the child for a period of three or more
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141507 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steven T. Miller
revocation because, at the time of sentencing in the instant case, he had not yet begun serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10936 - 2005-03-31
revocation because, at the time of sentencing in the instant case, he had not yet begun serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10936 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis R. Armstrong
of the crime, his apparent continued harassment of the victim, his belief that he had not been wrong, and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10956 - 2005-03-31
of the crime, his apparent continued harassment of the victim, his belief that he had not been wrong, and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10956 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ralph Axelson
held that all of Axelson's claims had been unsuccessfully raised in his direct appeal. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8296 - 2005-03-31
held that all of Axelson's claims had been unsuccessfully raised in his direct appeal. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8296 - 2005-03-31
Deborah J. Bull v. City of St. Croix Falls
property. This court disagrees. The City acknowledged it had a duty to protect Bull’s property from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15664 - 2005-03-31
property. This court disagrees. The City acknowledged it had a duty to protect Bull’s property from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15664 - 2005-03-31
Gail B. Eder v. Daniel P. Merline
her testimony to those incidents that had occurred in recent weeks causing her to believe she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15312 - 2005-03-31
her testimony to those incidents that had occurred in recent weeks causing her to believe she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15312 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ralph Axelson
of Axelson's claims had been unsuccessfully raised in his direct appeal. We agree, and affirm. No. 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8296 - 2017-09-19
of Axelson's claims had been unsuccessfully raised in his direct appeal. We agree, and affirm. No. 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8296 - 2017-09-19