Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10211 - 10220 of 69007 for had.
Search results 10211 - 10220 of 69007 for had.
State v. Frank S. Smith
an entrapment defense. The trial court instructed the jury on that defense as follows: If Mr. Smith had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31
an entrapment defense. The trial court instructed the jury on that defense as follows: If Mr. Smith had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
he had a medical reason for his refusal. He asserts that his testimony on that score
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28519 - 2014-09-15
he had a medical reason for his refusal. He asserts that his testimony on that score
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28519 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Armstrong
owed at $162.72. 2 Armstrong had signed and discussed with his lawyer a plea questionnaire which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10956 - 2017-09-19
owed at $162.72. 2 Armstrong had signed and discussed with his lawyer a plea questionnaire which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10956 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Armstrong
owed at $162.72. 2 Armstrong had signed and discussed with his lawyer a plea questionnaire which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10955 - 2017-09-19
owed at $162.72. 2 Armstrong had signed and discussed with his lawyer a plea questionnaire which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10955 - 2017-09-19
State v. Randy A. Weishar
motion to dismiss the charges because the State had allegedly not produced potentially exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3774 - 2005-03-31
motion to dismiss the charges because the State had allegedly not produced potentially exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3774 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles E. Snodgrass
, we determine whether the magistrate had a substantial basis to conclude that probable cause existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4163 - 2010-12-29
, we determine whether the magistrate had a substantial basis to conclude that probable cause existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4163 - 2010-12-29
[PDF]
Lewis Lloyd v. Firstar Bank Fond du Lac
that Lloyd’s claims had already been adjudicated in a prior foreclosure action between the parties. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3855 - 2017-09-20
that Lloyd’s claims had already been adjudicated in a prior foreclosure action between the parties. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3855 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. William A. Gasper
defense that would have been available had the timeframe been further narrowed. Gasper had been given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10941 - 2017-09-20
defense that would have been available had the timeframe been further narrowed. Gasper had been given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10941 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in open court that he had failed to visit or communicate with the child for a period of three or more
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141507 - 2017-09-21
in open court that he had failed to visit or communicate with the child for a period of three or more
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141507 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Frank S. Smith
. The trial court instructed the jury on that defense as follows: If Mr. Smith had no prior intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8921 - 2017-09-19
. The trial court instructed the jury on that defense as follows: If Mr. Smith had no prior intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8921 - 2017-09-19