Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10221 - 10230 of 50122 for our.
Search results 10221 - 10230 of 50122 for our.
[PDF]
Linnea Verges v. Pierce County
., 33 Wis.2d 488, 501-02, 148 N.W.2d 44, 50- 51 (1967). Therefore, our jurisdiction is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14017 - 2014-09-15
., 33 Wis.2d 488, 501-02, 148 N.W.2d 44, 50- 51 (1967). Therefore, our jurisdiction is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14017 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP1027-CRNM 2 filed a response. On our independent review of the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=890350 - 2024-12-19
. No. 2023AP1027-CRNM 2 filed a response. On our independent review of the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=890350 - 2024-12-19
State v. Todd D. Dagnall
this action and that we should exercise our discretionary authority to grant him a new trial. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24497 - 2006-03-15
this action and that we should exercise our discretionary authority to grant him a new trial. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24497 - 2006-03-15
State v. Touchia Yang
. Yang was advised of his right to respond to the reports and has elected not to respond. Upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9929 - 2005-03-31
. Yang was advised of his right to respond to the reports and has elected not to respond. Upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9929 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858564 - 2024-10-10
RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858564 - 2024-10-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the records and of counsel’s analysis in the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987074 - 2025-07-22
, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the records and of counsel’s analysis in the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987074 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
exercise of sentencing discretion. Our review of the appellate Record satisfies us that the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919430 - 2025-02-26
exercise of sentencing discretion. Our review of the appellate Record satisfies us that the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919430 - 2025-02-26
CA Blank Order
evidence and a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116669 - 2014-07-15
evidence and a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116669 - 2014-07-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155049 - 2017-09-21
to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155049 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and third-degree sexual assault. Our review of the circuit court’s conclusion that Nicolai did not meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84313 - 2014-09-15
and third-degree sexual assault. Our review of the circuit court’s conclusion that Nicolai did not meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84313 - 2014-09-15