Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10221 - 10230 of 50122 for our.
Search results 10221 - 10230 of 50122 for our.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95329 - 2014-09-15
appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95329 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212533 - 2018-05-07
our review of the briefs and record, we 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212533 - 2018-05-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192954 - 2017-09-21
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192954 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of justice. Based upon our No. 2020AP924 2 review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467624 - 2021-12-28
of justice. Based upon our No. 2020AP924 2 review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467624 - 2021-12-28
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106647 - 2014-01-13
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106647 - 2014-01-13
State v. Jerry L. Anderson
. Our review of the record discloses that Anderson’s no contest guilty pleas were knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11462 - 2005-03-31
. Our review of the record discloses that Anderson’s no contest guilty pleas were knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11462 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption that the [circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139096 - 2015-04-01
arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption that the [circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139096 - 2015-04-01
CA Blank Order
his motions to award costs and to amend case captions. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108028 - 2014-02-10
his motions to award costs and to amend case captions. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108028 - 2014-02-10
CA Blank Order
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. After our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92104 - 2013-01-23
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. After our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92104 - 2013-01-23
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. Cameron Gilbert
to do so here. Our review is de novo. Id. Applying this de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9697 - 2005-03-31
to do so here. Our review is de novo. Id. Applying this de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9697 - 2005-03-31