Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10231 - 10240 of 12576 for abuse.

Stephen J. Highman v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
an elderly woman claimed that her son physically abused her. Highman interviewed the woman at the scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2419 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Armund M. Janto v. Monica L. Janto
, it was learned that she had not let up on the abusive manner in which she treated her daughter. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4525 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
) about warrantless entry into a home at the scene of a child abuse call, see State v. Boggess, 110 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34789 - 2008-12-08

Philip Arreola v. State
, and alcohol or other drug abuse treatment." Section 980.06(2)(c), Stats. [5] Section 980.06(2)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8737 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey R. Schertz
. Whoever, in a public or private place, engages in violent, abusive, indecent, profane, boisterous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15619 - 2005-03-31

State v. Cornelius Reed
and abetting the mother's intentional and reckless physical abuse of their daughter. In a four to three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9497 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
this[.] …. It is very common for women, for whatever reason, [who] subject themselves to violent, abusive relationships
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101921 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
refers to the circuit court’s purported “abuse of discretion.” Concluding this phrase carried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172825 - 2017-09-21

State v. Keith Schroeder
(Ct. App. 1988) (holding that it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to exclude testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15926 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Anthansiou C. Kourtidias
, it is not an abuse of discretion to impose a sentence without a presentence investigation. See State v. Schilz, 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9653 - 2017-09-19