Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10231 - 10240 of 83350 for simple case search/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and ran eastbound towards the 53rd Street Community School. Officers searched the area and observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107884 - 2017-09-21

State v. Wilfredo Melo
not, without more, give rise to probable cause to search that person.’” We agree. However, in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11060 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
to challenge the search of his home. The circuit court denied the claim, and Streff appealed. We affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49838 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] SC Table of Pending Cases - added the decisions in case nos. 2013AP557-CR, 2013AP1345-CR
July 7, 2015 WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT TABLE OF PENDING CASES Clerk of Supreme Court
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144210 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Sheila L. Hardnett
, 1996, after City of Beloit police officers entered the residence at 1004 Harvey pursuant to a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12545 - 2017-09-21

State v. Sheila L. Hardnett
Harvey pursuant to a search warrant, they found Hardnett and another female in the bedroom. Hardnett had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12545 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
This case concerns whether the circuit court erred by not granting Linsmeyer’s request to subpoena phone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301683 - 2020-11-05

David J. Dowiasch v. Tracy L. Dowiasch
, the court subtracted $1000 for some Deletron pulsation units, and $1,500 for a Pipeline milking system
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15026 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] David J. Dowiasch v. Tracy L. Dowiasch
paid for it, and that there was a question as to who owned it. Next, the court subtracted $1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15026 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
on the grounds that the search was unlawful. Because the trial court erred in taking judicial notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33791 - 2014-09-15