Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10231 - 10240 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 10231 - 10240 of 58506 for speedy trial.
State v. Larry N. Henkel
., and an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Henkel argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12465 - 2005-03-31
., and an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Henkel argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12465 - 2005-03-31
David J. Bley v. Deborah J. Bley
motion for reconsideration and a new trial. She argues on appeal that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24964 - 2006-05-02
motion for reconsideration and a new trial. She argues on appeal that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24964 - 2006-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion for relief pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2005-06).[1] We conclude that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32894 - 2008-06-02
postconviction motion for relief pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2005-06).[1] We conclude that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32894 - 2008-06-02
Michael W. Hilger v. Wisconsin Central, Ltd.
Central, Ltd.[1] The trial court dismissed the action based on the jury's finding that William Hilger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8657 - 2005-03-31
Central, Ltd.[1] The trial court dismissed the action based on the jury's finding that William Hilger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8657 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the trial court lacked competency to decide the motion because the record in Smith’s underlying case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32894 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court lacked competency to decide the motion because the record in Smith’s underlying case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32894 - 2014-09-15
State v. Terry L. Cleveland
a trial court order denying his motion to reduce his sentence. We affirm the trial court. In February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11121 - 2005-03-31
a trial court order denying his motion to reduce his sentence. We affirm the trial court. In February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11121 - 2005-03-31
Mary E. Haun v. Thomas V. Rankin, M.D.
injury. Haun argues that the trial court should have changed the jury’s answer to the cause question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3327 - 2005-03-31
injury. Haun argues that the trial court should have changed the jury’s answer to the cause question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3327 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, John P. Halusan, and from a judgment against it in favor of Halusan entered after a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913794 - 2025-02-12
, John P. Halusan, and from a judgment against it in favor of Halusan entered after a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913794 - 2025-02-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
beyond a reasonable doubt, that trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30931 - 2014-09-15
beyond a reasonable doubt, that trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30931 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
doubt, that trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance of counsel, and that a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30931 - 2007-11-19
doubt, that trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance of counsel, and that a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30931 - 2007-11-19