Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10251 - 10260 of 50107 for our.
Search results 10251 - 10260 of 50107 for our.
State v. Carl G. Brosinski
. In view of our decision as to the statutory basis for admission of defendant's evidence, we need not reach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9050 - 2005-03-31
. In view of our decision as to the statutory basis for admission of defendant's evidence, we need not reach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9050 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. With regard to Matos-Rodriguez’s guilty pleas, our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=966766 - 2025-06-10
erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. With regard to Matos-Rodriguez’s guilty pleas, our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=966766 - 2025-06-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994). Upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854735 - 2024-10-01
Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994). Upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854735 - 2024-10-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sufficient to warrant a modification of Silva’s payments. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884944 - 2024-12-03
sufficient to warrant a modification of Silva’s payments. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884944 - 2024-12-03
[PDF]
State v. Andrew J. Hawe
not be accorded. No. 04-1680-CR 3 ¶3 We reject this theory based on our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7573 - 2017-09-19
not be accorded. No. 04-1680-CR 3 ¶3 We reject this theory based on our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7573 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Timothy D. Dopke
. 2d 1, 20, 456 N.W.2d 797 (1990). We will exercise our discretionary reversal power only sparingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26587 - 2017-09-21
. 2d 1, 20, 456 N.W.2d 797 (1990). We will exercise our discretionary reversal power only sparingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26587 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192954 - 2017-09-21
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192954 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91295 - 2014-09-15
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91295 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and excessive. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102304 - 2017-09-21
and excessive. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102304 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108438 - 2017-09-21
was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108438 - 2017-09-21