Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10261 - 10270 of 30191 for de.
Search results 10261 - 10270 of 30191 for de.
State v. Shawn D. Pierce
. The sufficiency of a complaint is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fawcett, 145 Wis. 2d 244
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18698 - 2005-06-27
. The sufficiency of a complaint is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fawcett, 145 Wis. 2d 244
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18698 - 2005-06-27
[PDF]
WI APP 144
to the Superintendent’s statutory construction, as the issue presented is one of first impression. Our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54885 - 2014-09-15
to the Superintendent’s statutory construction, as the issue presented is one of first impression. Our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54885 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kenneth D. Paulson
counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial we review de novo without deference to the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12178 - 2005-03-31
counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial we review de novo without deference to the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12178 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Hubert Tucker, Jr.
of law, which we review de novo. Trujillo, ___ Wis. 2d ___, ¶11; State v. Lechner, 217 Wis. 2d 392, 424
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17866 - 2005-05-03
of law, which we review de novo. Trujillo, ___ Wis. 2d ___, ¶11; State v. Lechner, 217 Wis. 2d 392, 424
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17866 - 2005-05-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Evans v. Luebke, 2003 WI App 207, ¶16, 267 Wis. 2d 596, 671 N.W.2d 304. ¶22 Mark’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257972 - 2020-04-14
review de novo. Evans v. Luebke, 2003 WI App 207, ¶16, 267 Wis. 2d 596, 671 N.W.2d 304. ¶22 Mark’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257972 - 2020-04-14
[PDF]
Michael F. Johnson v. Amanda A. Ziegler
. Johnson appeals.3 ANALYSIS ¶5 We review a circuit court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3448 - 2017-09-19
. Johnson appeals.3 ANALYSIS ¶5 We review a circuit court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3448 - 2017-09-19
Patricia A. Steiner v. Wisconsin American Mutual Insurance Company
. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review a summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6700 - 2005-03-31
. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review a summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6700 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Patricia A. Steiner v. Wisconsin American Mutual Insurance Company
judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court. Guenther v. City of Onalaska, 223 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6700 - 2017-09-20
judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court. Guenther v. City of Onalaska, 223 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6700 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of statutes and their application to a particular set of facts is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175577 - 2017-09-21
of statutes and their application to a particular set of facts is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175577 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 210
de novo, we often defer to an agency’s interpretation of a statute that the agency is charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30103 - 2014-09-15
de novo, we often defer to an agency’s interpretation of a statute that the agency is charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30103 - 2014-09-15