Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10271 - 10280 of 46783 for show's.
Search results 10271 - 10280 of 46783 for show's.
COURT OF APPEALS
a claim. If it does, we determine whether the answer shows that a material factual dispute exists. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100215 - 2013-07-31
a claim. If it does, we determine whether the answer shows that a material factual dispute exists. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100215 - 2013-07-31
State v. Michael J. Rice
witness testify. The record of the hearing shows that Rice's subpoenaed witness was not present, but he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9120 - 2005-03-31
witness testify. The record of the hearing shows that Rice's subpoenaed witness was not present, but he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9120 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show that his lawyer’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136384 - 2017-09-21
ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show that his lawyer’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136384 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William W. Bair
in the trial court’s discretion, and a defendant who challenges a sentence has the burden to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2833 - 2017-09-19
in the trial court’s discretion, and a defendant who challenges a sentence has the burden to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2833 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Peterson failed to show that he provided the City with a timely notice that he was seeking review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174091 - 2017-09-21
that Peterson failed to show that he provided the City with a timely notice that he was seeking review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174091 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an offer of proof showing that: (1) the prior acts clearly occurred; (2) the prior acts closely resembled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82611 - 2014-09-15
an offer of proof showing that: (1) the prior acts clearly occurred; (2) the prior acts closely resembled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82611 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
showed up.” The record also discloses no arguable basis for challenging the court’s discretionary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115595 - 2017-09-21
showed up.” The record also discloses no arguable basis for challenging the court’s discretionary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115595 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
shows no other ground to withdraw the plea. There is no arguable merit to this issue. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236351 - 2019-02-27
shows no other ground to withdraw the plea. There is no arguable merit to this issue. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236351 - 2019-02-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, a defendant must show that: (1) evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37302 - 2014-09-15
a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, a defendant must show that: (1) evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37302 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be rebutted only by showing clear intent to the contrary. Id. Questions of multiplicity and legislative
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338259 - 2021-02-24
be rebutted only by showing clear intent to the contrary. Id. Questions of multiplicity and legislative
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338259 - 2021-02-24