Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1031 - 1040 of 32701 for SUBPOENA FORM.

Luann Gerl v. Phillip M. Steans
) refused to subpoena evidence for the criminal trial; and (6) violated attorney-client confidentiality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9698 - 2005-03-31

State v. Carlos Lucho Phillips
in narrative form, and the officer had followed this pattern. The court concluded that the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7963 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Luann Gerl v. Phillip M. Steans
to subpoena evidence for the criminal trial; and (6) violated attorney- client confidentiality by permitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9698 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 8, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
Jesus Solis. The State secured Dunigan’s presence by subpoena, which ordered him to be available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28348 - 2007-03-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was dismissed, but the circuit court stated he was not released from subpoena. ¶6 Called by the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180526 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Carolyn G.
to a subpoena sent to Scharinger ordering her to appear on that date. She also argues that she could not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5012 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Carolyn G.
to a subpoena sent to Scharinger ordering her to appear on that date. She also argues that she could not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5013 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
, on August 22, 2007, police applied for and obtained a search warrant for the black phone and subpoenas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94286 - 2013-03-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for the black phone and subpoenas for the telephone records of both phones. With the assistance of the cell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94286 - 2014-09-15

State v. Donald A. Lesavage
to see if a subpoena had been either issued or served. These arguments are not compelling. First, had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15409 - 2005-03-31