Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1031 - 1040 of 82690 for case code.

[PDF] KML Development Corporation v. Clyde Schreiber
, we find WIS. ADMIN. CODE § ATCP 134.06(2)(b)1 to be inapplicable in this case. Nor do we find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3947 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
deposit statement” as required by the administrative code; PJL violated WIS. ADMIN. CODE § ATCP 134.06(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380509 - 2021-06-23

KML Development Corporation v. Clyde Schreiber
find Wis. Admin. Code § ATCP 134.06(2)(b)1 to be inapplicable in this case. Nor do we find any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3947 - 2005-03-31

Alyson Marklein v. Horizon Investments
for various code violations at the building, some of which were still outstanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13339 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Alyson Marklein v. Horizon Investments
with a maintenance employee and they eventually learned that Horizon had been cited for various code violations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13339 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
prohibited storing wrecked or junked vehicles, see TOWN OF VINLAND, WIS., CODE § 410-32 B. (8) (2024),2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965303 - 2025-06-04

Village of Avoca v. Gail Carr
.[1] Gail Carr appeals a judgment that she violated the zoning code of the Village of Avoca
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3232 - 2005-03-31

121 Langdon Street Group v. Scott Heiligman
of Review ¶4 This case requires that we interpret and apply city ordinances, statutory provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7526 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] 121 Langdon Street Group v. Scott Heiligman
the judgment of eviction and an initial money judgment, Silverman successfully moved to reopen the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7526 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI App 69
. Sec. 93.07(24); WIS. ADMIN. CODE § ATCP 75.10. ¶5 In Lafayette County Circuit Court Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878326 - 2025-01-24