Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1031 - 1040 of 29713 for des.

City of Milwaukee v. Shirley A. Negley
claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11004 - 2005-03-31

Labor Ready, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
it is entitled to “due weight” or “great bearing.” The lowest level of review, the de novo standard, is applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18634 - 2005-07-26

Mary Jane Lenhardt v. Paul W. Lenhardt
met her burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Finally, we note that a request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15820 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 51
for reinstatement must be denied at this time. ¶8 The dissent characterizes this result as a de facto
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28981 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
employ de novo review. See Kohn v. Darlington Cmty. Schs., 2005 WI 99, ¶11, 283 Wis. 2d 1, 698 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347001 - 2021-03-23

COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 179, 192–193, 717 N.W.2d 1, 7. We review the matter de novo. Id., 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56991 - 2010-11-22

Marcia A. Klein v. Wisconsin Resource Center
invasion of the employees’ personal privacy.” After conducting a de novo review of the record request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12177 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Labor Ready, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
it is entitled to “due weight” or “great bearing.” The lowest level of review, the de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18634 - 2017-09-21

State v. Derrick Benton
successive photographic arrays taints a subsequent lineup identification is a legal issue that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2527 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Milwaukee v. Clifford R. Negley
. The Negleys claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11005 - 2017-09-19