Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1031 - 1040 of 4456 for neg.

State v. Andrew D. Birmingham
that had a negative impact on the field sobriety tests. Birmingham was asked to recite the alphabet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18733 - 2005-06-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
himself. Both parties responded in the negative. Defense counsel then indicated that he had talked
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133052 - 2017-09-21

Marcella J. Hopp v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
was a negative inference based on the absence of evidence. It is the duty of the applicant for MA to demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5984 - 2005-03-31

State v. Dave Burton
with the finding that failure to freeze or refrigerate a sample does not alter positive or negative results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10965 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
that Borowski’s tendency to be “‘hysterically over-reactive’ … caused prior negative affects to the children’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108053 - 2014-02-12

[PDF] State v. Todd Jerovetz
the prosecutor developed a negative impression of Williams after negotiating the plea agreement, and, while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5356 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
experienced any prior sexual abuse. Ashley responded negatively to three questions pertaining to prior sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29154 - 2007-06-26

Robbyn Bowman v. Gregory Pekkala
, which if considered Gregory contends would result in “a negative net worth.” Gregory claims the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25791 - 2006-07-04

State v. Phillip M. Ross
not protective against sexual offending. Have you heard of these before? A Um-hum. …. Q Chronic negative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18694 - 2005-06-27

CA Blank Order
negatively or that it was dividing property as a punishment. Rather, the court explained that part of its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127892 - 2014-11-09