Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1031 - 1040 of 3429 for y's.

COURT OF APPEALS
. The court then said: “[M]y decision was to give Mr. Hamilton an opportunity to be heard on his original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35017 - 2008-12-29

State v. Mary K.
, and how the parent has done with that responsibilit[y], and here we have evidence that goes right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18073 - 2005-05-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
occurred: Q: [Y]ou’re hoping that all those seemingly good things about you that we just talked about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317120 - 2020-12-22

[PDF] NOTICE
. Further, “[a] statement can be corroborated ... [b]y other evidence which substantially corroborates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60366 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
is not “reasonabl[y] related to the seriousness of the alleged offense” in light of his prior service record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57413 - 2010-12-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
living situation where [he] would be [a parent] as opposed to [a] good friend[] and good budd[y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86508 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
[.] [Y]ou deserve it.” Heintz visually recorded the events on his cellphone. The parties’ two young
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105043 - 2017-09-21

Polk County v. Jeff A. Blanski
., Shoreland Protection Zoning Ordinances, art. XII, § 12.3B (1991), lists as a permitted use, the “[y]ear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4286 - 2005-03-31

State v. John Konaha
Konaha’s competency to proceed, indicating in a letter to the court: [M]y interaction with Mr. Konaha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5740 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
the apartment while Veal and her children remained inside: [y]ou and Miss Veal have a disagreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58253 - 2014-09-15