Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10301 - 10310 of 12913 for prosecuting.
Search results 10301 - 10310 of 12913 for prosecuting.
2009 WI APP 44
was the prosecution’s centerpiece. The circuit court convicted Ohlinger of both charges, and he now appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35869 - 2009-05-11
was the prosecution’s centerpiece. The circuit court convicted Ohlinger of both charges, and he now appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35869 - 2009-05-11
COURT OF APPEALS
and the weight of the testimony, rather than to the legality of the prosecution in the first instance.” Id. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35788 - 2009-03-09
and the weight of the testimony, rather than to the legality of the prosecution in the first instance.” Id. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35788 - 2009-03-09
State v. Dennis J. King
dismissing its prosecution of Dennis J. King, Ronald E. King, Simon W. DeCoteau, Ronald W. Hill and Earl J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11467 - 2005-03-31
dismissing its prosecution of Dennis J. King, Ronald E. King, Simon W. DeCoteau, Ronald W. Hill and Earl J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11467 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 39
by noting that a “revocation hearing is not part of the criminal prosecution” and that “the legislature did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28186 - 2007-03-27
by noting that a “revocation hearing is not part of the criminal prosecution” and that “the legislature did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28186 - 2007-03-27
COURT OF APPEALS
simply because she worked for the same entity as the prosecuting attorney. Id., ¶¶2-3. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70381 - 2011-08-29
simply because she worked for the same entity as the prosecuting attorney. Id., ¶¶2-3. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70381 - 2011-08-29
Frontsheet
that prosecution for an unreasonable fee was not authorized. The OLR also "took note of the fact that prior
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50466 - 2013-09-30
that prosecution for an unreasonable fee was not authorized. The OLR also "took note of the fact that prior
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50466 - 2013-09-30
[PDF]
State v. Jason E. Braasch
character witnesses because he did not want to open the door for the prosecution to present rebuttal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4411 - 2017-09-19
character witnesses because he did not want to open the door for the prosecution to present rebuttal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4411 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conviction or acquittal is a bar to another prosecution for the same offense.’” Id. (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=489199 - 2022-03-01
conviction or acquittal is a bar to another prosecution for the same offense.’” Id. (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=489199 - 2022-03-01
[PDF]
State v. Terry A. Apel
Therefore, if the law enforcement officer, for the purpose of obtaining evidence on which to prosecute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3219 - 2017-09-19
Therefore, if the law enforcement officer, for the purpose of obtaining evidence on which to prosecute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3219 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
element of the prosecution’s case.’” State v. Rockette, 2006 WI App 103, ¶41, 294 Wis. 2d 611, 718 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985112 - 2025-07-23
element of the prosecution’s case.’” State v. Rockette, 2006 WI App 103, ¶41, 294 Wis. 2d 611, 718 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985112 - 2025-07-23