Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10301 - 10310 of 83461 for simple case search.
Search results 10301 - 10310 of 83461 for simple case search.
State v. Brad A. Peterson
would lack arguable merit. In his response, Peterson raises: (1) a challenge to the search and seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11888 - 2005-03-31
would lack arguable merit. In his response, Peterson raises: (1) a challenge to the search and seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11888 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of an alleged illegal detention and frisk, the search of his house and Gardipee’s inculpatory statements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111233 - 2014-04-28
of an alleged illegal detention and frisk, the search of his house and Gardipee’s inculpatory statements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111233 - 2014-04-28
State v. Brad A. Peterson
would lack arguable merit. In his response, Peterson raises: (1) a challenge to the search and seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11887 - 2005-03-31
would lack arguable merit. In his response, Peterson raises: (1) a challenge to the search and seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11887 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Constitution offer protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.[3] “‘The temporary detention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147170 - 2015-08-26
Constitution offer protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.[3] “‘The temporary detention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147170 - 2015-08-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
testimony about Ali’s possession of evidence that had been suppressed in an earlier case. We reject Ali’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40355 - 2014-09-15
testimony about Ali’s possession of evidence that had been suppressed in an earlier case. We reject Ali’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40355 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael J. Dyer
and judgment was entered. He now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶6 The issue in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19139 - 2005-08-01
and judgment was entered. He now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶6 The issue in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19139 - 2005-08-01
Ronald Pierner v. Computer Resources and Technology, Inc.
of facts permitting the trial court to decide the case on the legal issues, although always subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13043 - 2005-03-31
of facts permitting the trial court to decide the case on the legal issues, although always subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13043 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ronald Pierner v. Computer Resources and Technology, Inc.
permitting the trial court to decide the case on the legal issues, although always subject to the rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13043 - 2017-09-21
permitting the trial court to decide the case on the legal issues, although always subject to the rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13043 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Dyer
guilty and judgment was entered. He now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶6 The issue in this case is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19139 - 2017-09-21
guilty and judgment was entered. He now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶6 The issue in this case is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19139 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in an earlier case. We reject Ali’s arguments and affirm the judgment and order. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40355 - 2009-09-02
in an earlier case. We reject Ali’s arguments and affirm the judgment and order. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40355 - 2009-09-02