Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10311 - 10320 of 68292 for did.
Search results 10311 - 10320 of 68292 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
duty at that time to ensure that Lonski did not leave the area for her protection. Officer Strzok
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49293 - 2010-04-26
duty at that time to ensure that Lonski did not leave the area for her protection. Officer Strzok
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49293 - 2010-04-26
State v. James A. Johnson
was admissible because its prejudicial effect did not substantially outweigh its probative value. See id. at 185
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16160 - 2005-03-31
was admissible because its prejudicial effect did not substantially outweigh its probative value. See id. at 185
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16160 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bruce M. Stevens
that the police did not have a reasonable suspicion that knocking and announcing their presence would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12216 - 2017-09-21
that the police did not have a reasonable suspicion that knocking and announcing their presence would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12216 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael Cruz
of counsel, filed a § 974.06, Stats., motion alleging that he did not fully comprehend the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7821 - 2005-03-31
of counsel, filed a § 974.06, Stats., motion alleging that he did not fully comprehend the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7821 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 22, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
immediately because he did not want his children to see it. Burris stated that he brought the gun with him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74124 - 2011-11-21
immediately because he did not want his children to see it. Burris stated that he brought the gun with him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74124 - 2011-11-21
[PDF]
State v. James A. Johnson
such evidence was admissible because its prejudicial effect did not substantially outweigh its probative value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16160 - 2017-09-21
such evidence was admissible because its prejudicial effect did not substantially outweigh its probative value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16160 - 2017-09-21
Shawn Carlson v. Frank B. Gleichsner
to support the findings the trial court did make. City of Stoughton v. Thomasson Lumber Co., 2004 WI App 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7529 - 2005-03-31
to support the findings the trial court did make. City of Stoughton v. Thomasson Lumber Co., 2004 WI App 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7529 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert Junior Carr
of crack cocaine. With its verdict, the jury rejected Carr’s defense that the drugs did not belong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18142 - 2017-09-21
of crack cocaine. With its verdict, the jury rejected Carr’s defense that the drugs did not belong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18142 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Crosse. The investigator searched the CI and did not locate any contraband, and the investigator
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676250 - 2023-07-07
Crosse. The investigator searched the CI and did not locate any contraband, and the investigator
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676250 - 2023-07-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” The court did not grant Schroeder’s request because it lacked information from the DOC as to whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665431 - 2023-06-07
.” The court did not grant Schroeder’s request because it lacked information from the DOC as to whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665431 - 2023-06-07