Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10321 - 10330 of 63758 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 10321 - 10330 of 63758 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
his postconviction motion for a new trial. Dehne contends that he did not validly waive his rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89958 - 2012-12-03
his postconviction motion for a new trial. Dehne contends that he did not validly waive his rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89958 - 2012-12-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Appellate counsel, Ann Auberry
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645324 - 2023-04-18
the order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Appellate counsel, Ann Auberry
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645324 - 2023-04-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for him. At sentencing, Sparks’s counsel advised the court that he had filed the withdrawal motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823763 - 2024-07-10
for him. At sentencing, Sparks’s counsel advised the court that he had filed the withdrawal motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823763 - 2024-07-10
[PDF]
State v. Robert T. Sankovich
). Subsequently, Sankovich filed numerous motions, only one of which is relevant to this appeal: a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12866 - 2017-09-21
). Subsequently, Sankovich filed numerous motions, only one of which is relevant to this appeal: a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12866 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion for a new trial. Dehne contends that he did not validly waive his rights under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89958 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion for a new trial. Dehne contends that he did not validly waive his rights under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89958 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion, and that the record does not support the court’s exercise of its sentencing discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195291 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion, and that the record does not support the court’s exercise of its sentencing discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195291 - 2017-09-21
State v. Latasha J.
., Debreill J., DeaJane J., and Deveon J. She also appeals from an order denying her post-termination motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6059 - 2005-03-31
., Debreill J., DeaJane J., and Deveon J. She also appeals from an order denying her post-termination motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6059 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
, Wooten filed a motion contending that the police had lacked cause to stop and arrest him and seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27589 - 2006-12-26
, Wooten filed a motion contending that the police had lacked cause to stop and arrest him and seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27589 - 2006-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
deer, he contends the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31870 - 2008-02-18
deer, he contends the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31870 - 2008-02-18
City of De Pere v. Jesse J. Oskey
motion to suppress all evidence derived directly, or indirectly, from his arrest. This court affirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19363 - 2005-08-22
motion to suppress all evidence derived directly, or indirectly, from his arrest. This court affirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19363 - 2005-08-22