Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10321 - 10330 of 66014 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 10321 - 10330 of 66014 for motion to dismiss.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
seeks to return this case to a presentence status so that he may file a motion for plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246554 - 2019-09-12
seeks to return this case to a presentence status so that he may file a motion for plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246554 - 2019-09-12
COURT OF APPEALS
the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, we deny the motion to dismiss as unnecessary. [4] Alswager also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76794 - 2012-01-18
the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, we deny the motion to dismiss as unnecessary. [4] Alswager also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76794 - 2012-01-18
[PDF]
State v. Danuele M. Johnson
, and not suppression. The trial court concluded that dismissal was not an available remedy, and denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7408 - 2017-09-20
, and not suppression. The trial court concluded that dismissal was not an available remedy, and denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7408 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the merits, we need not address the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, we deny the motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76794 - 2014-09-15
on the merits, we need not address the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, we deny the motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76794 - 2014-09-15
State v. Danuele M. Johnson
order denying his motion to vacate the judgment and suppress evidence. Johnson contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7408 - 2005-03-31
order denying his motion to vacate the judgment and suppress evidence. Johnson contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7408 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. Aman Singh appeals from a circuit court order denying his motion to reconsider
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102774 - 2013-10-08
., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. Aman Singh appeals from a circuit court order denying his motion to reconsider
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102774 - 2013-10-08
[PDF]
State v. Jermaine L. O'Conner
jurisdiction and should have dismissed O’Conner’s motions. Nonetheless, because the trial court correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10906 - 2017-09-20
jurisdiction and should have dismissed O’Conner’s motions. Nonetheless, because the trial court correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10906 - 2017-09-20
State v. Jermaine L. O'Conner
motions. The trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and should have dismissed O’Conner’s motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10906 - 2005-03-31
motions. The trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and should have dismissed O’Conner’s motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10906 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Anderson B. Connor v. Sara Connor
the hearing on the motion, the court dismissed Polich's affidavit as "self-serving." It stated that it did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17472 - 2017-09-21
the hearing on the motion, the court dismissed Polich's affidavit as "self-serving." It stated that it did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17472 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Anderson B. Connor v. Sara Connor
the hearing on the motion, the court dismissed Polich's affidavit as "self-serving." It stated that it did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17504 - 2017-09-21
the hearing on the motion, the court dismissed Polich's affidavit as "self-serving." It stated that it did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17504 - 2017-09-21